⌂ BERKELEY CITY COUNCIL SCORECARDS
Independent analysis. Informed voters. Better government.
Accountability Record · Updated August 2026
Berkeley City Council — Incident Record
All documented accountability incidents · Scores reduce 20% per year when no similar incidents recur

What is an incident? An incident is a documented accountability event that cannot be captured by automated transcript or voting analysis alone. Incidents can arise from any verifiable source — meeting transcripts, constituent communications, news coverage, court filings, public records requests, or other public documents. Each incident is scored on named dimensions; each dimension carries a pillar tag indicating which aspect of a council member's performance it implicates (Character & Conduct or Fiscal Stewardship). Scores are editorial assessments grounded in documented facts. Reasonable people may weigh the same facts differently; the reasoning behind each score is shown in full on the incident page. Incidents can be positive as well as negative — a member who proactively exposes a problem or demands accountability earns points here.

Filter by: All Bartlett Blackaby Humbert Ishii Kesarwani LunaParra OKeefe Taplin Tregub Full Council
2026
Kesarwani Humbert Ishii Character & Conduct Fiscal Stewardship
Hopkins Item 27 — Fire Review Claim Not Supported by Its Own Source
Item 27 made a Fire Department finding the stated predicate for a binding referral: 'Given new information presented by the Fire Department that pedestrian and bike safety infrastructure retains workable emergency access.' Page 7 asserts fire objections 'no longer exist.' The item's own footnote sources the quote to a FITES document that scopes the finding to Alternatives 1 and 2 by name — neither of which is the one-way Class IV configuration adopted. Fire Chief Sprague testified four hours before the vote that the Department had 'not reviewed' that configuration and needed 2–4 weeks once a design set existed. The claim also underpins a $3–4M cost increase. No caveat appears anywhere in the 754-page packet.
Kesarwani
-22
Humbert
-6
Ishii
-6
Tregub Bartlett Character & Conduct
The Hopkins Vote — Two Members Cross Coalitions, Neither Explains Why
The Hopkins Corridor plan passed 7–2, but the motion sequence shows a Council split 5–4 on the merits. Tregub stated that constraining staff's options at the outset would put the City 'in a corner,' voted for the analysis-first substitute, then 90 seconds after it failed voted for the main motion that fixed the alignment before any of that analysis — with no explanation on the record. Bartlett voted for all three mutually incompatible motions without reconciling them. Both affected district representatives (O'Keefe, Blackaby) opposed the adopted plan.
Tregub
-14
Bartlett
-9
Full Council Fiscal Stewardship
FY2027–2031 CIP — Infrastructure Backlog Reaches $2.1B With No Structural Fix
The five-year Capital Improvement Program presented to the Budget and Finance Committee documents $2.115B in unfunded capital needs — up from $1.1B in 2021 despite three bond cycles. Streets PCI is 56 ('at risk'), flat since 2022. The General Fund baseline contribution is $12M/year, unchanged. No council member has proposed a structural fix; the FY2028 budget about to be adopted does not change the trajectory.
Full Council
-8
Blackaby Humbert Ishii Tregub Fiscal Stewardship
May 19 Budget Hearing — Revenue-Only Lockstep, No Structural Fix
At the May 19 budget hearing, Blackaby, Humbert, and Ishii each stated 'there is no way I could vote for a budget that closed Station 4' — then voted unanimously for a budget that closes Station 4 in FY2028 unless a sales tax passes in November. All three locked themselves into the bond/tax revenue path with no structural alternative on the table.
Blackaby
-5
Humbert
-5
Ishii
-7
Tregub
-5
Ishii Character & Conduct
Mayor's Monthly April 2026 — Attendance Log, Not Leadership
Ishii's April newsletter opens with an Easter Bunny photo and reports events she attended rather than initiatives she drove. The budget section reprints her pre-input-meeting statement unchanged — no signal that public participation altered her thinking.
Ishii
-6
Ishii Character & Conduct
Office Art Reception — Public Benefit Framing for a Private Amenity
Ishii hosted an art reception for works selected for her own office — a space accessible to almost no one — and framed it as support for Berkeley artists. A popup gallery in nearby vacant storefronts would have provided real visibility and foot traffic at equivalent cost.
Ishii
-6
Bartlett Character & Conduct
Household Entanglement with City Subcontractor
Bartlett's wife co-incorporated Upline Solutions, a city subcontractor on a $607K cannabis education contract that failed to deliver. No public disclosure or recusal from related votes was identified.
Bartlett
-18
Full Council Bartlett · additional Character & Conduct Fiscal Stewardship Pending verification
BYA Cannabis Contract — Institutional Accountability Failure
Despite a county evaluation documenting BYA contract failures, the council reauthorized a $106K soda tax grant with no documented review. Bartlett additionally deflected accountability in public remarks.
Full Council
-3
Bartlett
-7
Ishii Character & Conduct Fiscal Stewardship Pending verification
Sugar Tax Panel — Credential Misrepresentation and Duty of Care
Ishii was appointed to the Sugar Tax Panel despite lacking required credentials, then cited the appointment in her mayoral campaign. The panel's performance verification record during her tenure is unconfirmed.
Ishii
-11
Bartlett Character & Conduct
American Renewal Plan — Federal Policy Framework on District Platform
Bartlett published a five-pillar national economic reform framework on his council office platform — addressed to federal policymakers — while Berkeley faces an unresolved structural fiscal crisis and unaddressed local failures. None of the plan's pillars touches any Berkeley Priority 1 (P1) problem.
Bartlett
-10
LunaParra Ishii Tregub Fiscal Stewardship
Flock Safety Contract — Negotiated Protections Dismissed
LunaParra and Ishii authored a supplemental to reject the Flock ALPR contract; Tregub co-sponsored. Their sanctuary-city rationale ignored that Berkeley's City Attorney had already negotiated full protections. After 132 public speakers and debate past 1 a.m., the item was continued unanimously to a June 2 special meeting. Final vote pending.
LunaParra
-9
Ishii
-8
Tregub
-6
Full Council LunaParra · additional Ishii · additional Character & Conduct
Police Accountability Board Collapse — Aguilar Firing
Council voted 8–0 to fire ODPA Director Aguilar while the PAB was at 4 of 9 seats with all original commissioners gone. LunaParra voted yes then issued a statement she was 'concerned the Council does not value Police accountability.' Ishii declared the council 'remained committed' immediately after eliminating the office's leadership.
Full Council
-7
LunaParra
-12
Ishii
-10
Blackaby Character & Conduct Fiscal Stewardship
Zone Zero Fire Ordinance — Proactive Public Safety Leadership
Blackaby initiated and built unanimous council support for a Zone Zero ember-resistant barrier ordinance covering ~1,200 Berkeley hills homes — moving ahead of repeated state delays. Secured a $1M CalFire grant for low-income compliance and structured additional private and tax-credit funding mechanisms. Cited nationally as a model by wildfire experts.
Blackaby
+8
2025
Full Council Taplin · additional Tregub · additional Fiscal Stewardship
Rocky Road Streets Audit — Findings Received, Lessons Ignored
Council filed the City Auditor's Rocky Road streets audit (PCI 57; $42M/year gap; bond dependence as root cause), then five months later unanimously directed a fifth bond cycle — the exact pattern the audit had documented as the cause of failure. Taplin authored the bond schedule concurrent with the audit filing; Tregub called the bond 'essential' with no mention of the audit's structural findings.
Full Council
-5
Taplin
-10
Tregub
-9
2024
Tregub Character & Conduct
Howard Johnson Motel — Community Meeting Three Weeks After Council Vote
Tregub held a community meeting on the Howard Johnson interim housing project three weeks after the council had already voted to approve the operating contract — framing a notification meeting as a community conversation after the outcome was already determined.
Tregub
-8
2023
Taplin Bartlett Fiscal Stewardship
Council Office Staffing Doubled on Consent Calendar During Structural Deficit
Taplin authored and Bartlett co-authored a consent calendar item doubling authorized council office staffing (1→2 FTEs per office; ~$442K/year recurring) during an acknowledged structural deficit — no floor debate, no alternatives analysis, justified by citing informal over-staffing that already existed.
Taplin
-8
Bartlett
-4
No incidents are on record for this filter. That is not a finding of good conduct — it means no qualifying incident has been documented and scored here yet. See the methodology for what gets recorded, and the member’s scorecard for the scored record.
Scores are editorial assessments based on documented facts. Each incident page shows full reasoning for every dimensional score. Pending verifications are noted where vote records, meeting minutes, or tenure dates have not been independently confirmed. Incident scores feed into member scorecards via the Character & Conduct and Fiscal Stewardship pillars according to each dimension's pillar tag. See methodology for the full scoring framework.